
Crop rotation key to increasing nutrient content of grains
By Joanne Thiessen Martens
Crop rotation is known to have many benefits, especially in organic
production, and researchers at the University of Manitoba are adding
another one to the list – crop rotation can affect nutrient content
in grains such as wheat.
Martin Entz, Soleil Turmel and Keith Bamford of the Department of Plant
Science at the University of Manitoba compared the concentration of
ten mineral nutrients in wheat grown organically and conventionally
in two different crop rotations over first 15 years of the Glenlea Long-Term
Rotation Study, located just south of Winnipeg. Preliminary results
indicate that including a perennial alfalfa stand in a grain crop rotation
boosted the concentrations of certain nutrients in wheat grain.
The two crop rotations used during the nutrient study were a perennial-based
rotation of wheat, alfalfa, alfalfa, flax; and an annual rotation of
wheat, pea, wheat, flax. Each of these rotations was grown under both
conventional and organic management. In the organic systems, crop rotation
was the only source of fertility; no animal manures or other products
were applied. In the conventional systems, crops were fertilized to
soil test recommendations.
Zinc and copper concentrations were higher and phosphorus concentrations
were lower in wheat grown in the organic rotation that included alfalfa
than in any of the other rotations. Nitrogen and sulfur concentrations
were lower in wheat grown in an annual organic rotation than in the
perennial organic rotation or in either conventional rotation.
Concentrations of other nutrients, including potassium, calcium, magnesium,
iron, and manganese, were not affected by crop rotation or organic vs.
conventional management.
While the reasons for these differences in nutrient content are not
always clear, the researchers point to crop rotation and the effect
of different crop rotations on soil nutrient levels as likely being
major factors.
In the annual organic system, where the only source of nitrogen was
one grain legume crop (peas) in a four-year rotation, soil N levels
were very low, resulting in lower plant uptake and a low N concentration
in the grain. In the perennial organic system, on the other hand, the
nitrogen supplied by a two-year stand of alfalfa provided an adequate
supply to the annual crops in the rotation.
This does not mean that all organic annual crop rotations are nitrogen
deficient. According to Entz, an annual rotation that includes legume
green manures on a regular basis can supply enough nitrogen for the
other crops in the rotation. The frequency of the green manure crop
will depend on the region, the amount of biomass produced by the green
manure, and the nitrogen requirements of the other crops. The annual
rotation in the Glenlea study was modified in 2004 and now includes
a fababean green manure.
The alfalfa hay crop in the perennial rotation caused other differences
in nutrient content as well. Harvesting alfalfa hay removed large quantities
of phosphorus from the field, and since this P was never replaced, soil
P levels became very low in the perennial organic system, limiting plant
uptake of P. Phosphorus removal from the annual organic system, on the
other hand, was much lower and therefore P was not limiting in this
system. A low phosphorus concentration in wheat is not considered to
be problematic from a nutritional perspective, as it is readily available
in many foods and unlikely to be deficient.
Low levels of available soil P in the organic perennial rotation may
have been the cause of higher zinc and copper concentrations in wheat
grown in this system as well. When available P levels are low, plants
such as flax, legumes, and cereals associate more closely with mycorrhizal
fungi, a naturally occurring soil micro-organism that forms mutually
beneficial relationships with plant roots. These fungi increase the
uptake of certain nutrients, including the trace minerals zinc and copper.
While it is possible that these trace minerals were simply “diluted”
in the higher yielding conventional crops, the differences between the
two organically managed rotations seem to indicate that crop rotation
was at least partially responsible for this phenomenon.
As consumers continue to seek out healthier foods, the nutrient content
of organic products will likely enter the spotlight more prominently.
Knowing how crop rotation and soil nutrient levels affect the nutritional
value of crops is a key component in comparing the quality of organic
and conventional foods.
Joanne Thiessen Martens is a Research and Extension Associate with
the Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada working in collaboration with
Dr. Martin Entz at the University of Manitoba.
“We gratefully acknowledge funding support
from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada for for production of this publication.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) is pleased to participate in
this project. AAFC is committed to working with industry partners to
increase public awareness of the importance of the agriculture and agri-food
industry to Canada. Opinions expressed in this document not necessarily
those of the OACC or AAFC.”
en français
Posted June 2008